PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Satyavrat Verma, J
Rahul Kharwar @ Rahul Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner withdraws anticipatory bail application with permission to refile. (Para 8) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 09-12-2025 Heard Mr. Sushant Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Anita Kumari, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 241 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304 (5) of the BNS , 2023.
3. Learned APP for the State, at the outset, submits that the law is clear that where offences for which an FIR has been instituted carries punishment of seven years and less, the arrest is not automatic. It is next submitted that in the event if the police intends to arrest an accused who is implicated in a case relating to offences which carries punishment of seven years or less, in that event the police has to resort to certain procedure as incorporated in the BNSS, i.e., the police first has to give a notice under Section 35 of the BNSS. The learned APP next submits that anticipatory bail may or may not be maintainable after the accused receives notice under Section 35 BNSS, as it will depend on the facts and circumstance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.