SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5616

PATNA HIGH COURT
Shailendra Singh, J
Shivji Sahni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19750 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Karn
For the Respondents: Mr.Ravi Ranjan, AC to SC (22)

Court refrains from exercising writ jurisdiction for encroachment issues due to available civil remedies.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the issue of encroachment on ancestral land as claimed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner sought removal of such encroachment and police protection, but the Court was not inclined to exercise its writ jurisdiction, citing the availability of a remedy in Civil Court and directed the District Magistrate to address the petitioner’s representation within two weeks. The Court focused on procedural compliance rather than substantive relief.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests for removal of illegal encroachment on ancestral land. (Para 2)
2. court emphasizes other legal remedies available in civil courts. (Para 3)
3. writ petition disposed with directions to respond to representation. (Para 4)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 09-12-2025 The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

“I. For issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s) or directions commanding the respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment made by private respondents on the petitioner’s ancestral land bearing Khata no. 202, Khesra No. 76, Area 11 Dismal, situated at village-

Dumharpatti, Ward No.2, Mauza- 163, P.S.- Pupri District- Sitamarhi and for demarcation and protection of the petitioner’s peaceful possession thereof.

II. For direction upon the respondent No.7, the SHO, Pupri police station, Sitamarhi to provide police protection during the removal of encroachment and re-demarcation.

III. For direction upon the respondent No. 5, D.C.L.R., Pupri to conduct fresh measurement and demarcation of the said land in presence of the petitioner and local witnesses.

IV. For direction upon the higher authorities (Respondents 2 & 3) to ensure compliance with the Circle Officer’s order dated

12.08.2025 (Annexure- P/3).

V. For any other relief(s) to which the petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case”.

2. Mr. Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Karn, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, learned AC to SC-22 for the State- respondents are present and they are heard.

3. The main issue raised by the petitioner relates to an encroachment allegedly made by the private persons over the petitioner’s so claimed land. For redressal of this issue the petitioner has an efficacious remedy before the Civil Court.

This court is not persuaded to invoke writ jurisdiction of this court to redress the petitioner’s issue at this stage. However, the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, respondent no.3, is directed to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 27.09.2025 as per provisions of law within two weeks from the date of receipt/

production of a copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

(Shailendra Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top