SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5662

PATNA HIGH COURT
Shailendra Singh, J
Amit Kumar @ Amit Yadav @ Ajit Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72144 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Ajay Mukherjee
For the Respondents: Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP

Bail granted due to prolonged detention and completion of investigation despite serious allegations under the Arms Act.

Headnote:The Court considered the provisions of the Arms Act, specifically Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35, in the context of a bail application where the petitioner was alleged to have been involved in the recovery of firearms linked to an illicit loot incident, offering compelling arguments regarding his prolonged detention and the completion of investigation. The Court noted the release on bail was warranted due to gravity of punishment for the involved offences and assured that the release would not hinder prosecution proceedings. The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon fulfilling specified conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

3 18-12-2025 Heard Mr. Ajay Mukherejee, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 213/ 2025 dated 05.07.2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act .

3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner’s counsel are that the instant matter relates to the recovery of two country-made pistols and five live cartridges allegedly kept in a bag near a bush, though, it has been alleged that this petitioner was involved in connection with an offence of loot, a separate case bearing Katoriya P.S. Case No. 211/ 2025 has already been registered in respect of the said occurrence and so far as the recovery of the alleged firearms is concerned, the same was made pursuant to the disclosure of five accused persons, including the petitioner and not at the instance of the petitioner alone and further, material witnesses of the prosecution who are to be examined during the trial of the petitioner are police personnel and the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 06.07.2025 and against him the investigation has been completed.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner and submits that there are serious allegations against him as he was firstly remained involved in the offence of loot and thereafter in the recovery of firearms.

5. Heard both the sides and perused the FIR and case diary of this case. Though, the instant matter relates to the recovery of firearms but considering the petitioner’s custody period as well as completion of the investigation against him and also the fact that the main witnesses of the prosecution who are to be examined during the trial of the petitioner are police personnel, so, the release of the petitioner at this stage will not affect the prosecution in any manner, this court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be released on bail in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 213/ 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the petitioner shall be released on bail after framing of charge.

(Shailendra Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top