SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5672

PATNA HIGH COURT
SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA, J
Mamta Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47870 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-206 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Shiv Sager Sharma
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP

Bail granted based on the assessment of specific allegations against co-accused, maintaining presumption of innocence.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks bail under Sections 341, 342, 366(A), 376 and 34 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act after being accused of physical assault regarding the kidnapping and rape of a minor by her son. The FIR was delayed, raising suspicion about the allegations against the petitioner. The Court found the prime allegations against the co-accused Vikash Kumar who is in custody. Balancing the allegations, the Court granted bail to the petitioner under designated conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

5 05-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. None appears on behalf of the opposite party no.2 despite valid service of notice.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341 , 342, 366(A), 376 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act .

that one Vikash Kumar kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant by allurement from the house around midnight and raped her by restraining her in a room for three days and when she tried to escape, she was physically assaulted by the petitioner, who is mother of Vikash Kumar.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be apparent from the narration of the F.I.R. itself that the allegation is specific against co-accused Vikash Kumar of having allured the victim girl subjecting her to sexual intercourse and so far as the petitioner is concerned, there is an allegation of physical assault by the petitioner. It has further been submitted that as a matter of fact, petitioner has been made an accused in this case only in view of the fact that she happens to be the mother of the main accused Vikash Kumar. It has also been pointed out that the entire F.I.R. is suspicious on account of fact that the same was lodged after a delay of four days as the daughter was taken away on 18.06.2024 while the informant waited for lodging a case on 22.06.2024. The statement of the victim girl is also specific against Vikash Kumar and with regard to assault there is only general and omnibus allegation also that she was assaulted on the pretext of being a thief.

6. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of report.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the thrust of allegation is against co-accused Vikash Kumar, who is also in custody and the petitioner is his mother, coupled with the fact that the present petitioner is in custody since 28.12.2024 and the charges have already been framed in the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Court, POCSO-cum-A.D.J.-VI, Vaishali at Hajipur/concerned Court below in connection with Mahnar P.S.

Case No. 206 of 2024. (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top