SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 5744

PATNA HIGH COURT
Sourendra Pandey, J
Phul Choudhary @ Phul Babu Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
Cr. Misc. No. 10119 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-45 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Amar Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma

A modification of bail conditions must consider the accuracy of prior statements regarding criminal antecedents.

Headnote:In the context of bail modification, the petitioner sought to amend previous statements regarding antecedents, asserting an inadvertent mistake had occurred regarding prior criminal cases. The opposing party contested this modification, citing suppression of truth. The court upheld prior conditions stipulated regarding bail verification, ultimately dismissing the modification application as a consequence.

Table of Content
1. court's observation on bail conditions and antecedents. (Para 6)
2. final conclusion on application dismissal. (Para 9)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER

2 19-12-2025 Heard Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 17.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.

No. 10119 of 2025 whereby the petitioner was granted bail.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently in paragraph-3 of the bail application (Cr. Misc. No. 10119 of 2025) it was mentioned about seven cases pending against his name however there were nine criminal antecedent of the petitioner.

4. It has been submitted that it was a bonafide mistake and therefore the same may be amended to the aforesaid extent and the order dated 17.06.2025 be modified. It has further been submitted that the petitioner was initially released on bail upon furnishing of the bail bonds however upon verification of the criminal antecedent his bail bonds have been cancelled and therefore the need of the present modification application.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for modification of such order stating that the petitioner has suppressed the criminal antecedent and in view of the condition as contained in para-5(d) of the order dated 17.06.2025 this should be dismissed.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by the parties, it has been observed that the petitioner was granted bail and there was a condition as contained in paragraph-5(d) which reads as under:

“d. The Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the aforementioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.”

6. In view of the same the present modification application cannot be allowed.

7. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall surrender and file a fresh bail application and he may be permitted to withdraw the present application with the liberty as sought aforesaid.

8. Prayer is accorded.

9. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top