PATNA HIGH COURT
SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA, J
Jai Kishore Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
4 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. This Cr. Misc. petition has been filed to cancel the bail of the O.P. Nos.2 & 3 which was granted by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.31607 of 2017, arising out of Ara Nawada P.S. Case No.113 of 2017.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order granting bail to O.P. Nos.2 & 3 suffers from serious infirmity inasmuch as the opposite parties had deliberately concealed their three criminal antecedents at the time of their bail application. He further submits that the concealment was material and had the potential to mislead the Court, thereby vitiating the satisfaction recorded while enlarging the accused on bail. Learned counsel submits that suppression of criminal history is sufficient ground for cancellation of bail, as it reflects lack of bona fide and renders the accused undeserving of the discretionary relief. Learned counsel, therefore, prayed that the bail granted earlier be cancelled and the opposite parties be taken into custody.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.