Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
Lakshman Mahto @ Chandan Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding delay in fir and absence of specific allegations. (Para 7) |
| 2. need for reasoning in judicial decisions. (Para 8) |
| 3. cognizance order quashed for lack of reasoning. (Para 9) |
| 4. conclusion and order to remand the case. (Para 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 13-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.
2. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 24.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge – VI cum Special Judge, SC/ST Court, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Special SC/ST Case No. 136 of 2023 arising out of Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 301 of 2023 (suppl.) registered under 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the IPC, later on Section 302 of IPC was added, and Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v)(a) of SC/ST Act whereby and whereunder summons have been issued against the appellant after taking cognizance under Sections 341 , 323, 302, 504, 506/34 of the IPC and Section 3(1)
(r)(s), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act against the appellant.
3. The prosecution story, in brief, informant alongwith his father was working in agricultural field and the four accused per
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
