PATNA HIGH COURT
Shailendra Singh, J
Archana Mukherjee @ Archana Mukherji – Appellant
Versus
Madhumesh Choudhary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's arguments for review application. (Para 4) |
| 2. opposing party's counterarguments against review. (Para 5) |
| 3. general principles governing review applications. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's findings on the review application. (Para 7) |
| 5. conclusion and order rejecting the review application. (Para 8) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER
7 07-11-2025 Heard Mr. Ravi Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Amit Shrivastava, learned senior counsel for opposite party (O.P.) Nos. 1 and 2, and Mr. Rohitabh Das, learned counsel for O.P. Nos. 3 and 4.
2. The present review application has been filed by the petitioner/respondent in F.A. No. 109 of 2023 under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 (in short, “C.P.C.”), seeking review of the order dated 27.02.2025 passed in I.A. No. 04 of 2025 arising out of F.A. No. 109 of 2023.
3. O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 have preferred F.A. No. 109 of
2023 against the judgment dated 22.06.2023 and decree dated 27.06.2023 passed by the Court of learned Sub-Judge-II, Patna, in Title Suit No. 478 of 2010, which have been challenged by way of the said appeal. In that appeal, an interloc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.