SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 375

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Chief Justice, CJ, Bibek Chaudhuri, J
Ankit Raj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3818 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sunita Kumari
For the Respondents: P.K. Shahi, Vikash Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan

Disputes regarding the interpretation of gift deeds and the authority to grant No-Objection Certificates for land use cannot be adjudicated within the scope of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL); the aggrieved party must seek remedy in a competent civil court.

Headnote:A public interest litigation was filed regarding land gifted in 1949 for educational purposes and a playground. It is alleged that a government building is being constructed on a portion of this land, which is claimed to be unauthorized. The respondents contend that a No-Objection Certificate was issued by the school administration and the gift deed does not restrict the land's use exclusively to education. The court identified the core issue as whether the school administration possessed the legal authority to grant a No-Objection Certificate for the construction of a government building on gifted land. The court reasoned that such factual and legal disputes regarding the interpretation of a gift deed and the validity of an NOC cannot be adjudicated within the framework of a public interest litigation. The writ petition stands disposed of.

Table of Content
1. prayer for protection of gifted school land (Para 1)
2. conflicting claims regarding noc and gift deed conditions (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. inappropriateness of pil for adjudicating title/contractual disputes (Para 7 , 8)
4. disposal of the petition (Para 9 , 10)

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

This writ petition in the nature of Public Interest Litigation has been filed by the petitioner, Ankit Raj with following prayer(s):-

“That the instant writ application, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation is being prepared by the writ applicant for an appropriate direction upon the respondent authorities to panchayat Khawaspur, Block: Pirpainti, District: Bhagalpur, in the year 1949 dated 22.08.1949 by Sri Mohan Mandal, Sabhapati spread over an area 3 acres, 38 decimals bearing Khata No. 5362, Khesra No. 5552, which is gifted for purpose of educational use and play ground and which land recorded as shown in the Register-II in the name of Middle School, Khawaspur reported by Anchal Adhikari, Pirpainti, District: Bhagalpur, School Code-10222604401 and record of owner of Account No. 2203411294005087 issued by Revenue and Land Reforms, District: Bhagalpur (Bihar).”

2. After issuance of notice, the counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 8 by one Abhimanyu Kumar, Block Development Officer, Pirpainti wherein in paragraph nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 it is stated as follows:-

“10. That it is further submitted that there is no dispute over the fact that the said piece of land is recorded in the name of the concerned School and this is also not in dispute that the construction of the said building is being done on the part of the land.

11. That it is further pertinent to state here that the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan being a Government Scheme was recommended over 0.50 Decimal, part of aforesaid land by the Circle Inspector, Pirpainti.

12. That thereafter the concerned School had also issued No-Objection Certificate on 16.11.2022 making the way clear for the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan.

13. That it is further submitted and stated that the issuance of No-Objection Certificate by the Headmaster of the School shows and proves that the School had no objection to the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan over part of its land.

14. That it is submitted and stated that the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan has been completed to a great extent i.e. upto IInd Story, and remaining work is still going on and on the verge of completion.

15. That it is also worth mentioning that neither the School Administration nor the Public has objection to the construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan.

16. That it is also necessary to bring to the kind notice of the Hon'ble Court that construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan has not affected the playground of the School adversely.”

3. The petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit which is dated 07.10.2025 wherein in paragraph nos. 6, 7 and 8, it is stated as follows:-

“6. That it is humbly submitted that in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order dated 22/09/2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court has been stated before filing the writ petition, the petitioner and the villagers had informed the Station House Officer[SHO]Aachari on 25/12/2024 to stop the construction, after which the SHO halted the construction; however, after stopping the work, after stopping the work, boring was started again and the construction work for building was commenced.

7. That even before the commencement of the work, the petitioner had always informed the concerned authorities through communication that a plan was being prepared to carry out the construction of a Panchayat Bhawan within the school premisses, which was legally unauthorized. [Is being also annexed in Annexures P/4-5 in this writ petition].

8. That the petitioner had been also submitted through as evidence of video construction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top