PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC-13011/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13011 of 2025
======================================================
Jitendra Singh Son of Ram Chandra Singh, Resident of Mohalla-Sherpur,
Gandak Colony, Police Station Sadar, District-Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Water Resources
Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Chief Engineer, Mechanical, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Mechanical Circle, Muzaffarpur.
5. The Executive Engineer, Mechanical, Irrigation Mechanical Division,
Muzaffarpur.
6. The Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur.
7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Government Pleader (10)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 31-01-2026
In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the
following relief(s):-
“That the present writ application is
being filed on behalf of the petitioner above
named for issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
order/orders in the nature of certiorari for
quashing part of order contained in letter no.
205 dated 27.02.2025 issued by respondent
no.5, whereby direction has been given to
withhold amount of Rs. 602768/- from post
retirement benefits i.e. gratuity amount and
pension amount on non est ground that the
case related to pay anamoly is pending for
consideration before this Hon'ble Court,
without appreciating the fact that this Hon'ble
Court vide order dated 09.02.2024 has already
##PAGE2##Patna High Court CWJC No.13011 of 2025 dt.31-01-2026
2/5
stayed the recovery from the salary of the
petitioner. In consequent thereof, the petitioner
further prays for direction to make payment of
entire gratuity amount as well as pension for
the period from February, 2025 to May, 2025
with admissible statutory interest to the
petitioner and for any other writ/writs,
order/orders which the petitioner may found to
be entitled in the facts and circumstances of
the case.”
2. Counsel for the petitioner by referring to the order as
contained in Letter No. 205 dated 27.02.2025, submits that on the
basis of certain anomalies in the pay fixation, the amount to the
tune of Rs. 6,02,768/- has been quantified for recovery but before
quantifying such amounts, no such proceedings known to the
service jurisprudence, is said to have ever been adopted, and
despite there being no misrepresentation on behalf of this
petitioner, such amounts have been directed to be recovered from
this petitioner after his retirement.
3. It is next submitted that anomalies in the pay fixation,
which is being shown for the purpose of making recovery, starts
from the period 2016 till the date of retirement on 31.01.2025. The
recovery cannot be made, if there is no representation, and as also
from the persons, who are low paid, especially Class-IV and Class-
III employees. It is the case of the petitioner that in view of the
judgment rendered in the case of State of Punjab and others vs.
Rafiq Masih White Washer & Ors. reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334
##PAGE3##Patna High Court CWJC No.13011 of 2025 dt.31-01-2026
3/5
the recovery is impermissible when excess payment has been
made for a period in excess of five years. The relevant para of the
aforesaid judgement is reproduced as under:-
“18. It is not possible to postulate all
situations of hardship which would govern
employees on the issue of recovery, where
payments have mistakenly been made by the
employer, in excess of their entitlement. Be that
as it may, based on the decisions referred to
hereinabove, we may, as a ready reference,
summarise the following few situations,
wherein recoveries by the employers, would be
impermissible in law:
(i) Recovery from the employees
belonging to Class III and Class IV service (or
Group C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.