PATNA HIGH COURT
Arun Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC-18137/2023
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 18137 of 2023
======================================================
Arun Kumar Yadav Son of Late Narayan Yadav, Presently Posted as
Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat - Gawalpara, Block - Chhatapur
District - Sapaul. Permanent resident of Village - Litiyahi P.S. Pipra, District -
Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar
Patna.
3. The Divisional Commissioner, Saharsa.
4. District Magistrate, Supaul.
5. The Sub-Divisional Officer cum Enquiry Officer, Triveniganj, District -
Supaul.
6. The Block Development Officer, Marauna District - Supaul.
7. The Block Development Officer Chhatapur, Distt. - Supaul.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Naresh Kumar Mehta, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Ms Archana Meenakshee, GP VI with
M/s Rana Veer Prawar, Harish Singh, Advocates
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 06-02-2026
Heard the parties.
2 The present writ petition has been filed for the
following reliefs:
“… … … for issuance of writ of
certiorari and mandamus or any other
appropriate writ (s)/order (s)/direction (s)
commanding the respondent authorities to set
aside the order dated 26.08.2022 passed by the
Commissioner, Koshi Diision, Saharsa in Srvice
Appeal Case No 97 of 2015 in the light of order
##PAGE2##Patna High Court CWJC No.18137 of 2023 dt.06-02-2026
2/6
dated 27.02.2015 passed in CWJC No 3185/2015
by this Hon’ble Court as well as order dated
28.06.2010 contained in Memo No 268-2 by the
DM, Supaul whereby and where under two
increments were withheld on the basis of
departmental enquiry report dated 12.03.2010
conducted by the SDO, Triveniganj -cum-
enquiry officer without issuance of show cause
notice which is mandatory in the eye of law
ignoring the facts and circumstances of this case
and further prayer is to provide all subsequent
consequential benefits including the period in
question of two years may be taken into account
in the ACP benefit and to grant any other
relief/reliefs to the petitioner which the
petitioner may be found entitled to get in the eye
of law.”
3 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Secretary on 25.07.2000
and since then he was working as the same. While posted at
Raghopur Block, the petitioner was transferred on 30.06.2009
from Raghopur to Marauna Block but was relieved on 04.07.2009
and on the next day, he gave his joining at Marauna.
Subsequently, vide Memo No 414-2 dated 17.07.2009 issued
under the signature of the Block Development Officer, Marauna,
he, along with others, was deputed to hand over charge w.e.f.
18.07.2009 to 23.07.2009. It has further been contended that
though the petitioner was present to hand over the charges to his
successor but till 08.08.2009, neither his successor took charge nor
the Block Development Officer, Raghopur relieved him and since
##PAGE3##Patna High Court CWJC No.18137 of 2023 dt.06-02-2026
3/6
his successor was not taking over charge from him, vide Memo No
1233-2 dated 06.08.2009 issued under the signature of Block
Development Officer, Raghopur, an order was issued to Shri
Shyam Sundar Yadav, who was posted as Panchayat Secretary at
Parmanandpur, to take over charge from the petitioner. It is further
contended on behalf of the petitioner that vide Letter No 1276
dated 12.08.2009 issued under the signature of Block
Development Officer, Raghopur addressed to the District
Magistrate, Supaul, it was intimated that the petitioner was
relieved from Marauna Block and was directed to report at
Raghopur where he gave his joining on 18.07.2009 but he is
absent thereafter and is not responding to the telephonic calls also,
in those circumstances, appropriate action be taken against him.
Accordingly, vide Memo No 320-2 dated 31.08.2009 issued under
the signature of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.