PATNA HIGH COURT
Shiv Lakhan Sahu
CWJC-9297/2022
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9297 of 2022
======================================================
Shiv Lakhan Sahu Son of Late Jaglal Sahu resident of Village Badhar, P.S.
Surunapur, P.O. Jehanabad, District Jehanabad, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Jamui.
2. The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Jamui Collectorate, Jamui.
3. The Circle Offiicer, Sikandra, Jamui.
4. The Treasury Officer, Jamui.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binay Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC25)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
3 31-01-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the State are present.
2.The present writ petition has been filed with a
specific prayer for payment of arrears of salary to the petitioner
for the period from 06.05.2006 to 31.01.2011, along with
interest. The said period includes the petitioner’s suspension
from 06.05.2006 to 13.04.2010, and the period from 14.04.2010,
i.e. after revocation of suspension and acceptance of his joining,
till his retirement on 31.03.2011.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter was earlier disposed of by an Award passed in CWJC
No. 9187 of 2015, wherein a direction was issued to the
##PAGE2##Patna High Court CWJC No.9297 of 2022(3) dt.31-01-2026
2/3
petitioner to file a representation before the District Magistrate,
Jamui, who was directed to dispose of the same within a period
of three months from the date of receipt thereof and to pay the
consequential benefits within a further period of three months
from the date of the said award. It was further directed that if
any amount was found not payable, a reasoned order in that
regard was to be communicated to the petitioner within the said
period. Learned counsel submits that pursuant to the said
direction, the petitioner preferred a representation on 19.03.2021
before the District Magistrate, Jamui; however, no order has
been passed within the stipulated period. Consequently, the
petitioner has preferred the present writ petition.
4. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand,
submits that although the counter affidavit has not yet been
filed, he fairly concedes that the order passed in CWJC No.
9187 of 2015, in the form of an award, is required to be
complied with.
5. Accordingly, the District Magistrate, Jamui is
hereby directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the
representation of the petitioner (Annexure-8 to the writ petition)
within a period of 90 days from the date of production of a copy
of this order, failing which the District Magistrate, Jamui shall
##PAGE3##Patna High Court CWJC No.9297 of 2022(3) dt.31-01-2026
3/3
be liable for contempt.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the
writ petition stands disposed off.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.