SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1811

PATNA HIGH COURT
Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar
CR. REV.-693/2025



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.693 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-804 Year-2024 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran

======================================================

XXXX

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ajay Rai S/O Late Bahawan Rai R/o Vill-Sabalpur,Hasti Tola, P.S.- Sonpur,

Distt- Saran at Chapra

... ... Opposite Parties

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kumar Yadav, Advocate

For the O.P.-State : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP

For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Anant Kumar Bhashkar, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA

ORAL ORDER

3 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,

submits that the name of the petitioner is Vinay Kumar but

while entering the cause title, mistake was made by the office

and the office wrongly entered the name of the petitioner as

‘Vijay Kumar’ and is still continuing the mistake and showing

the name as ‘Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar’. Learned counsel

further submits that as objection has been raised by the office,

the name Vijay Kumar was also added showing alias name as

Vinay Kumar.

3. Office is directed to correct the name in cause title,

##PAGE2##

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.693 of 2025(3) dt.29-01-2026

2/13

as I find from the petition that the petitioner has rightly

mentioned the name of the petitioner as ‘Vinay Kumar’ and it

was the fault of the office that name of petitioner as Vijay

Kumar came to be inserted in the cause title.

4. Though, from perusal of record, it transpires that in

the revision petition, the identity details of the Juvenile is being

disclosed, which is against the statutory provisions prescribed

under Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

Children) Act, 2015 which mandates protection of disclosure of

identity of the juvenile in conflict with law. Therefore, the

identity of the petitioner is being referred to in the cause title as

XXXX.

5. Registry while uploading the order on the website

shall also ensure that the cause title is reflected in similar

manner.

6. The instant revision petition has been filed for

setting aside the Judgment/Order dated 10.06.2025 passed by

the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge

(Children Court), Saran at Chapra in Criminal Appeal No. 20 of

2025 whereby and whereunder the learned Special Judge

(Children Court) dismissed the appeal of the petitioner affirming

the order dated 19.03.2025 passed by the learned Juvenile

##PAGE3##

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.693 of 2025(3) dt.29-01-2026

3/13

Justice, Board, Saran at Chapra and also to set aside the order

dated 19.03.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Saran at

Chapra rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for bail in

connection with J.J.B. Case No. 1067 of 2024 arising out of

Sonpur PS Case No. 804 of 2024 for the offences under Section

137(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and, later on, added

Sections 103(1), 61(2), 111, 3(5) of BNS.

7. Briefly stated, facts of the case leading to the

institution of the present petition are that the opposite party no.

2 lodged a case vide Sonpur P.S. Case No. 804 of 2024 under

Section 137(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging there

in that on 25.09.2024 at about 02:00 PM, the informant's son,

Suraj Kumar, left his home after receiving a phone call, but he

did not return. Later, at 9:00 PM, the complainant called him

and talked to him, after which his mobile phone was switched

off. During the call, the informant’s son told him that he was

near Mohammadpur and would return in an hour, but he did not

come back. After searching, the informant found no information

about his son's whereabouts. During investigation, the dead

body of son of the informant was found near Mahi river. The

name of the petitioner transpired during investigation in the

confessional statement o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top