PATNA HIGH COURT
Naveen Kumar
Cr.Misc.-6463/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6463 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1253 Year-2025 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
Naveen Kumar S/O Dilip Rai R/o- Tayakpur Bilat Chowk, P.S.-Deshri, Dist-
Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ghanshyam Tiwary, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in
connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 1253 of 2025,
registered for the offences under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the
NDPS Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, police received
information about a person selling Ganja from the house of one
Shambhu Kumar. A raid was conducted and a person tried to
escape but he was apprehended and he is the present petitioner.
From search of the place from where the petitioner was
apprehended, recovery of 4.730 kg Ganja was made. Further
recovery of mobile phone and cash was made from this
petitioner.
##PAGE2##Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6463 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
2/3
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated
in this case and he is innocent. There is non-compliance of
Section 42 of the NDPS Act and no videography was conducted
for the search and seizure in violation of Section 105 of the
BNSS. In fact nothing incriminating has been recovered from
person or possession of the petitioner and his signature was
obtained by the police in a plain paper. The alleged recovery of
Ganja is within the intermediate quantity as it is more than
small quantity but less than commercial quantity. The petitioner
is in custody since 03.12.2025 and he is having clean
antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
submission made on behalf of the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and
submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the
quantity of contraband recovered, submission of charge sheet
and period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed
to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Sessions
Judge, Spl. Judge (NDPS), Patna/concerned court, in connection
##PAGE3##Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6463 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
3/3
with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 1253 of 2025, subject to the
condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and
other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close
relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on
each and every date fixed by the court
below, if so required by the learned trial
court.
(iii) In case of absence on three
consecutive dates or in violation of the
terms of the bail, the bail bond of the
petitioner will be liable to be cancelled
by the court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Anuradha/-
U T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.