##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.922 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-497 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul

======================================================

Md. Shohrab @ Md. Shohrav son of Md. Belal @ Belaluddin Resident of

village- Maheshpur ward No 2 Ps -Supaul District- Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

ORAL ORDER

2 29-01-2026 Heard Mr. Prasoon Kumar, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned APP for the

State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

with Supaul P.S. Case No. 497 of 2025 registered for the offence

punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2),

118(1), 109, 352 and 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the

petitioner assaulted the informant’s mother with farsa on the

head, due to which she received bleeding head injury.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.922 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026

2/3

perusal of the FIR, it is clear that there is an allegation that the

petitioner has assaulted with farsa which is a sharp cutting

weapon, and the mother of the informant has received a

lacerated wound, which is not possible with farsa and the doctor

has also opined that the injuries were caused by a hard and blunt

substance. He also submits that the allegation and the injury

report do not co-relate. He further submits that a statement has

been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no

criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody

since 06.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by the learned

APP for the State and submits that the injuries on the head are

grievous in nature. Admittedly, there is an allegation of only one

blow; there is no repetition of blows. He also submits that from

perusal of the injury report, it will transpire that the doctor has

found two injuries: (i) Lacerated wound 5x1x1 cm on left

frontal region (ii) Bruise 3x2 cm in the right frontal region.

After a C.T. scan of the head, it was found that there were

multiple acute traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and extensive

facial and skull fractures. The doctor has opined that the injuries

are grievous in nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.922 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026

3/3

considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case

No. 497 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

Sudhanshu/-

U T