SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2205

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Ashok Kumar Pandey, J
Ranbir Kumar @ Ranveer Kumar @ M. P. @ Suman Kumar
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55363 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-41 Year-2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ved Prakash Chandan, Sanjay Kumar Ojha
For the Respondents: Mithlesh Kumar Khare

Grant of regular bail based on the principle of parity with co-accused and the absence of recovery of incriminating materials from the petitioner, despite the presence of criminal antecedents.

Headnote:The petitioner was accused of offences punishable under sections 310(4), 310(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(3), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that based on information regarding miscreants gathering to commit an offence, two individuals were arrested with firearms, and subsequent interrogation revealed the petitioner was planning to commit dacoity. The court noted that no recovery was made from the possession of the petitioner. The primary issue was whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail given the nature of the allegations and the existence of criminal antecedents. The court reasoned that the petitioner's situation is similar to other co-accused persons who have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of the court, thereby establishing a ground for parity. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

Table of Content
1. prosecution's case regarding planned dacoity and applicable charges under bns and arms act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding parity with co-accused versus the impact of criminal antecedents on bail. (Para 4 , 5)
3. judicial discretion to grant bail based on facts and parity. (Para 6)

ORAL ORDER

3 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 310(4), 310(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(3), 317(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that police had information that certain miscreants have gathered to commit some offence. Two persons, namely, Murari Jha and Dhiraj Kumar were arrested and firearm were recovered from their possession. During interrogation, it was revealed that this petitioner was also planning to commit dacoity whereupon a raid was conducted.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that similarly situated other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.11.2025 and 11.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 56503 of 2025 and 52053 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.02.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of four cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top