SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2343

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Bibek Chaudhuri, J
Prakhand Jan Sangharsh Samiti R.T.I. Manchits Secretary
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1180 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Amaresh Kumar, Mukesh Kumar No. 1
For the Respondents: Raghwanand, Sanjay Kr. Tiwari

A Public Interest Litigation is not maintainable when the subject matter is already being adjudicated by the competent statutory authority through a pending appeal.

Headnote:The petition involves the Bihar Public Encroachment Act, 1956, specifically Section 7. The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to remove encroachment on land designated as "GAIRMAZARUA SARVSADHARAN GADDHA" based on a final order dated 24.08.2024. The court noted that a previous order in a related writ petition had directed the filing of an appeal before the Collector. The primary issue is whether a Public Interest Litigation is maintainable when a statutory appeal is already pending before the competent authority. The court reasoned that since Appeal No. 11 of 2025 has already been filed and the Collector is in seisin over the matter, the court is not inclined to entertain the PIL. the same stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petition for encroachment removal and status of statutory appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. power of collector to remove encroachment under bihar public encroachment act. (Para 5)
3. dismissal of pil due to pending statutory remedy. (Para 6)

ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. This writ petition in the nature of Public Interest Litigation has been filed, seeking for following reliefs:

“I. For issuance of Writ especially in nature of Mandamus Dirécting and commånding to the Respondents No.-4 i.e. Circle officer Parwalpurto remove the Encroachment in term of Final order dated 24.08.2024 ( Not appealed as yet) over the Land bearing Khata No.-948, chak Plot No.-4631 an area of 0.54 acre situated in Mauza-Sharikardih, under Thana No.-146. As such the said land is "GAIRMAZARUA SARVSADHARAN GADDHA" as recorded in survey khatiyan, which has been encroached by private Respondents No.-5 to 7.

ii. For Further be pleased to issue writ in nature of Mandamus directing and Commanding Respondents to make it free the said land and make available for public uses in terms of Final order dated 24.08.2024 passed in Encroachment case No.-02/2024-25, which has not been challenged before the Ld. Collector Nalanda.

iii. For any other writ/writs, order/orders, direction/Directions for which, the Petitioner is legally entitled.”

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioners brought to the notice of the Court the order dated 09.10.2025 of the learned Single Judge passed in C.W.J.C. No. 16576 of 2025, wherein it is observed as follows:

“5. Considering the nature of prayer made in the present writ application and the fact that the order passed by the Circle Officer is appealable before the Collector, accordingly, the petitioners are directed to file appeal before the Collector, Nalanda, within a period of four weeks from today.

6. If such an appeal is filed by the petitioners, the Collector, Nalanda, shall dispose the same in accordance with law by a reasoned order within a period of four months from the date of filing of the appeal.

7. Till the disposal of the appeal by the Collector, Nalanda, the possession of the petitioners shall not be disturbed and there shall be no demolition of the alleged encroachment.”

3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioners that even though no appeal has been filed by the Petitioners of the said writ petition, but the State is also not taking any step to remove the encroachment.

4. However, the learned counsel for the State has brought to the notice of this Court that in terms of the order passed by this Court dated 09.10.2025, Appeal No. 11 of 2025 has already been filed before the Collector and he is in seisin over the matter.

5. Section 7 of the Bihar Public Encroachment Act, 1956 read as follows:

Section 7 - Power of the Collector to get encroachment removed and recover cost of the removal

If any person fails to comply with the orders passed by the Collector under section 6 directing the removal of any encroachment by the date fixed, the Collector shall cause the encroachment to be removed in such manner as he deems fit and the cost of such removal shall be recovered from such person.”

6. In view of such order passed by learned Single Judge and since the competent authority is in seisin over the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the Public Interest Litigation and the same stands dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top