SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2589

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Chandra Shekhar Jha, J
Bimal Kumar Jha
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35524 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Uday Chand Prasad
For the Respondents: Navin Kumar Pandey

Anticipatory bail may be granted when allegations of matrimonial cruelty are general and omnibus, and there is an unexplained delay in lodging the FIR.

Headnote:The petitioner was accused of committing mental and physical cruelty and demanding dowry, specifically a motorcycle and cash, under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court noted that the allegations were general and omnibus in nature and that the FIR was lodged with an unexplained delay of approximately two months. The primary issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail despite allegations of cruelty and non-compliance with maintenance orders. The court reasoned that the general nature of the allegations and the significant delay in filing the FIR weighed in favor of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Table of Content
1. case background and allegations of matrimonial cruelty and dowry demands. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the omnibus nature of allegations and maintenance defaults. (Para 4 , 5)
3. grant of anticipatory bail based on general allegations and fir delay. (Para 6)

ORAL ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhepura Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is to commit mental and physical cruelty upon the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry as raised for one bullet motorcycle and cash of Rs. Two Lakhs.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that allegation qua mental and physical cruelty as raised against the petitioner is very much general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that only to aggravate the allegation petitioner was alleged to advance threat for solemnizing second marriage. It is further submitted that as per FIR, last occurrence took place on 10.12.2023 but same was lodged on 07.02.2024, almost after two months without having any just explanation. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, while opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, submitted that petitioner forced the informant to live her life in destitution and he is also not complying the direction of learned Family Court, Madhepura as passed for an ad-interim maintenance, where learned Family Court granted interim monthly maintenance of Rs. 7000/- per month to the informant, however, learned A.P.P. fairly conceded that separate execution petition was preferred by the informant for execution of aforesaid order before the learned Family Court itself.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of the fact as allegation qua mental and physical cruelty upon the informant as alleged to be committed by the petitioner appearing very much general and omnibus in nature, coupled with the fact that FIR was also lodged with a delay of about two months, accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura/concerned court in connection with Madhepura Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short “B.N.S.S.”).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top