SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2891

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Bala Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Raju Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

4 21-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bihiya P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 352, 118(2), 303(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

3. In the evening of the fateful day, while the maternal nephew of the informant went to his farm, in the meantime, the accused persons caught hold of him and started abusing. On protest, they have brutally assaulted. It is further alleged that when the informant and others came to his rescue, they were also assaulted by the accused persons, due to which all of them have sustained serious injuries, besides the aforesaid allegation, the accused persons also snatched the valuables.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that besides the fact that the genesis of the occurrence is a land dispute, resulting into a free fight and injuries to the persons of both sides, there is no specific accusation against the petitioner that he has specifically assaulted any of the injured. Moreover, the maternal nephew of the informant has sustained one grievous injury, but the same is n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top