SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2893

PATNA HIGH COURT
Harish Kumar, J
Kajal Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50256 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-621 Year-2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sunil Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Umesh Lal Verma

The court granted bail based on the victim's statements implicating a deceased co-accused, affecting the accused's liability.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petitioner's apprehension of arrest regarding allegations under Sections 363, 366(A)/34 IPC. The case stemmed from the enticement of a minor, with substantial shifts in testimonies impacting the accused's culpability. The court found that the victim's statement, recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., largely implicated a co-accused who was deceased, thereby influencing the petitioner's bail eligibility favorably. The court issued a bail order conditional on her cooperation and specified amounts.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

4 21-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 621 of 2021 registered for the offences under Sections 363 , 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. Allegedly on the fateful day, the minor daughter of the informant had gone to attend the coaching class, and when she did not return, the informant and her family members tried to know about her whereabouts and later on they came to know that her daughter has been enticed away by co-accused Rahul Kumar. When the informant went to the house of Rahul Kumar, his parents abused and threatened.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner taking this Court through the F.I.R. contended that initially the F.I.R. was instituted against three named accused persons, including Rahul Kumar and his parents, but later on all of a sudden after a year, the victim girl returned and her statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. wherein she stated that on the alleged date of occurrence on 14.12.2021, it is the petitioner who had persuaded her to sit in the Scorpio vehicle along with Rahul Kumar and later on she was taken to Maharashtra, where some of the persons committed wrongful acts with her. The informant of this case, who is non-else but the mother of the victim categorically stated and filed an application before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara that co-accused Rahul might have allured and taken away her daughter and there is no role ascribed to his family members, moreover, the co- accused, Rahul Kumar also died on 27.09.2022. The petitioner is an unmarried woman, having fair antecedent and she undertakes that she will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the complicity of the petitioner is writ large from the statement of the victim, as recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the statement of the victim, which clearly suggests that the entire allegation revolves around co-accused Rahul Kumar, who had allegedly sold her to some unknown persons and the petitioner is a woman and having fair antecedent, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th District & Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court, POCSO, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 621 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close relative of the petitioner.

(Harish Kumar, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top