SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2898

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Md. Niyaz – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Bipin Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned Advocate for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.139 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 351(2)

and 3(5) of the BNS , 2023.

3. In the morning of the fateful day, while the informant was returning to his home after plucking some vegetables from his field, in the meanwhile, all the accused persons surrounded him and started abusing on account of prior dispute. It is further alleged that the accused persons, including the petitioners, who were variously armed with lathi and danda brutally assaulted the informant and when his brother Md. Arif and sister-in-law Chunni Khatoon came to his rescue, they were also assaulted by them, which led to serious injuries to all of them.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners, referring to the FIR, contended that despite the omnibus nature of allegation against five named accused persons, the alleged occurrence took place on 08.06.2025 and the present FIR came to be instituted on 10.06.2025. Moreover, it is the prosecution partie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top