SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2911

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Sima Devi @ Sima Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Deepak Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Shahkund P.S. Case No. 211 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 , 328 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. Based upon the fardbeyan, the informant alleged that his son Jitendra Kumar, who had been working in Delhi had come to home about one and half months ago. Just a day before, the petitioner no. 1 had called his son at her house and gave something to eat and thereafter her brother has driven him out from the house. Later on, he started making a complaint of severe pain in his stomach and thus, was taken to hospital.

However, in course of treatment, his son died on 23.04.2023.

4. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that admittedly the informant was not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence, but only on account of the suspicion, the name of the petitioners have been implicated in this case. In fact, the petitioner no. 1 is a wid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top