SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2913

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Pramod Kumar Verma, Rajkiran Kumar @ Damra – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91309 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary
For the Respondents: Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP

Bail granted based on lack of substantial evidence against the petitioners, reflecting the necessity of clear allegations for arrest.

Headnote:The case revolves around the petitioners' apprehension of arrest in connection with Biharsharif P.S. Case No. 582 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Key facts detail the death of the informant's sister, allegedly linked to petitioners, with the informant later claiming responsibility due to her pre-existing conditions. The court finds no substantial evidence of foul play or motive, and thus grants bail, stipulating conditions regarding sureties. The core issue includes whether the petitioners are likely to flee or tamper with evidence. Ultimately, the court orders the petitioners be granted bail under specified conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Biharsharif P.S. Case No. 582 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 80 , 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The marriage of the sister of the informant was solemnized with one Ravi Kumar on 07.02.2025. On 15.10.2025, the informant received a call that his sister has been done to death, whereupon he reached to her matrimonial house and found the dead body of his sister was lying on Sofa. It is further alleged that just after few minutes, the elder brother-in- law of the husband of his sister and his friend, who are the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 before this Court, along with the mother of the informant took the victim on a four wheeler vehicle. However, after two hours they have come out with the dead body of the deceased. The informant suspected the hands of the petitioners in causing the death of the deceased.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that even as per the F.I.R., there is neither any allegation of demand of dowry nor torture. Moreover, even if the allegation is taken to be true, for the sake of argument, it is the case of the prosecution that the unconscious sister of the informant or the deceased was taken to hospital along with her mother, however, she could not survive and thereafter the dead body was brought to the house. Post-mortem was also done and it has been found that she died on account of asphyxia, due to hanging. In fact, when the informant came to know about the false implication of the petitioners, he immediately filed a petition before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda with a categorical statement that his sister has committed suicide, as she was suffering from various ailments and there is no role of the petitioners in causing her death. This Court is also apprised that the husband of the deceased is already in custody for the last two months, moreover, the petitioners have got fair antecedent and they undertake that they will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application.

6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioners, coupled with the post-mortem report as well as the petition filed by the informant categorically stating that the petitioners have no role in causing the death of the deceased, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif, Nalanda in connection with Biharsharif P.S. Case No. 582 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close relative of the petitioners.

(Harish Kumar, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top