SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2917

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Kumari Pallavi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 203 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 and

120(B) of the Indian Penal Code .

3. The accusation against the petitioner is of procuring her appointment on the post of Panchayat Teacher by submitting forged and fabricated certificate.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was duly appointed as a Panchayat Teacher long back in the year 2013, after following all the due process. At the time of her appointment, all the certificates were duly verified but at no point of time, any such allegation has been levelled.

However, in compliance with the order of this Court in CWJC No. 15459 of 2014, the certificates of all the Panchayat Teachers were duly verified by the Vigilance and later on, the certificates submitted by the petitioner along with some other candidates have been suspected to be forged and fabricated. In fact, the petitioner is herself the victim of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top