SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2927

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Shailendra Sah @ Shelendra Sah @ Huro Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.92036 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari
For the Respondents: Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP

The necessity of recording reasons for arrest when offenses are punishable with up to seven years, following Arnesh Kumar ruling.

Headnote:The Court reviews a pre-arrest bail application under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioners, a father-son duo, are accused of involvement in the sale of a stolen motorcycle but assert their innocence. They reference Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar regarding prerequisites for arrest. The Court acknowledges their fair antecedents and grants bail, conditioned on certain assurances. The key issue addresses the procedural correctness of the arrest and bail conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is of involved in sale and purchase of stolen motorcycle and on the alleged date of occurrence, one motorcycle having without number plate on the fateful day, one customer had come on his motorcycle to sell some junk materials, however, noticing the police party, it is he, who succeeded in fleeing away, after leaving the motorcycle. The petitioners have nothing to do with the motorcycle, moreover, it has not been disclosed till date that the motorcycle, in question, was subject matter of which offence. It is further contended that admittedly the offence, as alleged in the FIR, are punishable up to seven years and, as such, the police must record reason showing necessity of arrest, as contemplated in Section 41 (A) of Cr.P.C./ Section 35(3) of the BNSS, 2023. To support the aforesaid contention, reliance has also been placed on a decision of the Apex Court in case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr., [(2014) 8 SCC 273] . It is lastly contended that be that as it may, the petitioners are father and son, having fair antecedent, and they undertake before this Court that they will fully co-operate in the proceeding of the Court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the aforenoted submissions, as also the mandate of the Apex Court in case of Arnesh Kumar (supra), besides their fair antecedent, let the petitioners above named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.- I, Banka in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family (Harish Kumar, J)

shivank/- U T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top