SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2928

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Vikash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Shiv Prasad Gupta
For the Respondents: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 71 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 352, 351(2) of the BNS.

3. On the fateful day, while the elder brother of the informant was ploughing filed, in the meanwhile, all the FIR named accused persons, including the petitioner along with some unknown persons, armed with farsa, garasa and pistol came there and started abusing. On protest being made, it is alleged that the accused persons brutally assaulted the father and brother of the informant. It is further alleged that this petitioner assaulted the informant by means of garasa due to which, he sustained cut injury in his finger.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the genesis of the occurrence is nothing but a land dispute. Moreover the injury which is allegedly sustained to the informant is concerned, the same was an unfortunate one and on non vital part. The petitioner is agnate and they are bickering over the land dispute and on the said date they entered into a scuffle resulting in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top