SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2930

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Bhola Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1161 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Anil Chandra, Adv., Mr. Priyajeet Pandey, Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv., Ms. Megha, Adv., Mr. Kaustubh Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Government Pleader (23), Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-23, Mr. Girijish Kumar, Adv., Mr. Akash Anand, Adv.

The court emphasized the need for sympathetic consideration of a petitioner's grievance due to a family member's disability when deciding transfer requests.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner sought a modification of a transfer/posting order due to his wife's physical disability, citing a government directive that allows head teachers to request specific postings. The court emphasized the need for sympathetic consideration of the petitioner's circumstances, directing the responsible authority to decide within four weeks. The key legal issues revolved around the appropriate consideration of the petitioner's grievance and options submitted for posting, with the court's ruling aimed at ensuring the welfare of the family unit.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 29-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner, who is presently working as a government school teacher in Exclusive Primary School, Jhakaur, Roh, Nawada, has preferred the present writ petition seeking a direction for the concerned respondents to consider his claim and redress the grievance by modifying his transfer/ posting order dated 17.07.2025, as contained in Annexure-P/4, and to post him as Head Teacher at the same school or nearby school where his wife is posted.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner’s wife is a person with physical disability (Locomotor Disabled) and suffers from multiple health issues. Due to her disability and medical condition, she requires regular medical supervision and continuous assistance in mobility and daily activities; hence the petitioner, being her husband, is the primary caregiver. It is further contended that while the petitioner was discharging his duty as an Exclusive Teacher at Primary School, he had appeared in the test duly conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission for the post of Head Teacher and subsequently he was selected for the post of Head Teacher. Since the petitioner is posted to a school which is situated at a far distant place, he could not submit his joining. In the meanwhile, the Government of Bihar, in the Department of Education, came out with a letter bearing no. 3253 dated 29.08.2025, addressed to all the District Education Officers, inviting options from all the newly recruited Head Masters to submit three options for their posting. In terms of the letter dated 29.08.2025, the petitioner immediately submitted his grievance with the option of the school on 08.09.2025 (Annexure-P/10). Despite the grievance having been raised by the petitioner, and his request for sympathetic consideration for his transfer near the school of his wife on account of she being 50% Locomotor Disabled, till date no decision has been taken. Hence, the present writ petition.

4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader No.23, has submitted that despite the fact the petitioner was appointed as a Head Master and he was directed to submit his joining within the prescribed period; the petitioner has failed to do so, and now he has approached this Court for his transfer to a school of his choice.

5. This Court has considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and took note of the facts, especially letter no. 3253 dated 29.08.2025, whereby options were invited from all the newly recruited Head Masters who have not submitted their joining in their respective schools, and in pursuance thereof the petitioner has already submitted his grievance along with the option, which has yet not been considered and disposed off. This Court deems it fit and proper to dispose off the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 2, the Director, Primary, Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, to consider the grievance of the petitioner and his option for posting in view of the submissions advanced hereinabove, especially keeping in mind the factum of physical disability of the petitioner’s wife, who has also been working as a primary teacher in Exclusive Primary School, Jhakaur, Roh, District- Nawada and take appropriate decision, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

6. This disposes the writ petition.

(Harish Kumar, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top