SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2941

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Indrajeet Rana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
MJC-2149/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Akhilesh Dutta Verma
For the Respondents: Mr. Ravi Kumar, AC to GP -13, Mr. Akshay Lal Prasad, AC to GP- 13

Compliance with court orders is mandatory, and deliberate disobedience may result in contempt proceedings.

Headnote:This case involves an appeal regarding compliance with previous court orders on pension and other benefits. The petitioner argued that payments were inadequate and incomplete. The court found deficiencies in adherence to its prior mandates, ordering compliance and potential contempt proceedings for willful disobedience.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

5 30-01-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the respective parties.

2. In compliance with the order of this Court, a supplementary show-cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar (opposite party no.3) with the averments that necessary actions have been taken and the petitioner has been paid certain amount under Group Insurance Scheme, General Provident Fund, Leave Encashment as well as Gratuity.

3. It is further stated that the petitioner has been allowed provisional pension till September, 2025. The concerned opposite party further vide Memo No. 682 dated 15.09.2025 has requested the office of the Accountant General to issue sanction order in favour of the petitioner for payment of full pension and gratuity enclosing the pension papers and original service book of the petitioner.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that besides the fact the petitioner has not been allowed salary for the month of December, 2016 and January, 2017. Even the provisional pension of the petitioner has been stopped after September, 2025 and, in fact, all the pensionary benefits, which have been mentioned in the supplementary show-cause affidavit, is confined to 90% of the entitlement of the petitioner.

5. Having heard the parties and on perusal of the materials, this Court is not satisfied to the supplementary show- cause affidavit, filed on behalf of opposite party no.3; inasmuch as till date the order of this Court has not been given effect to its letter and spirit.

6. In the aforesaid facts, this Court further directs the opposite party no.3 to ensure compliance of the order of this Court in its letter and spirit and ensure payment of all the admissible amount under all the heads preferably within a period of four weeks, failing which the Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Bihar (opposite party no.3) shall file a personal affidavit as to why not a contempt proceeding be initiated against him for his willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court.

7. Re-notify this case on 27.02.2026.

(Harish Kumar, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top