SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2967

PATNA HIGH COURT
HARISH KUMAR, J
Chandra Deep Chauhan @ Chandradip Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2715 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Umesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Murli Dhar, Ms. Chandni Kumari

Bail granted considering unexplained FIR delay and nature of injuries, balancing personal liberty against allegations.

Headnote:The court analyzed the allegations against the petitioners under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The facts indicate an assault on the informant, which the petitioners claim is fabricated due to prior animosity. The court found the delay in filing an FIR unexplained and the injuries suffered by the informant were simple in nature. The court framed the issue as whether bail could be granted despite the nature of allegations. It concluded that, given the circumstances, the petitioners should be granted bail, contingent on certain conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 04-02-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners, State and the learned Advocate for the informant.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 733 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. In the evening of the fateful day, while the informant was returning home, in the meanwhile, both the petitioners surrounded him and wrapped a towel around his neck and started dragging; thereupon petitioner no.1 brutally assaulted by means of lathi and left him in a semi-conscious state.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that the alleged occurrence took place on 13.09.2025, but the present F.I.R. came to be instituted on 20.09.2025 without their being any explanation for delay. The injuries, which are allegedly sustained to the informant, the same have also been found to be simple in nature, as is evident from the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. The reason behind the false implication of the petitioners is said to be previous animosity. The petitioners are men of fair antecedent and they undertake that they will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court. 5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State and the informant vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that the informant is a septuagenarian and he was brutally assaulted by both the petitioners.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the unexplained delay in institution of the F.I.R., coupled with the simple injury, besides the fair antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- I, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 733 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close relative of the petitioners.

(Harish Kumar, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top