SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3056

PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Ritik Pandey @ Ritik Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75012 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Md Ataul Haque
For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, Mr. Krishna Prabhat, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ambastha, Mr. Gyanchand Kumar

The court denied bail based on evidence of dowry death occurring within three years of marriage.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks bail under Sections 80 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023, alleging wrongful implication in dowry death. The informant’s daughter allegedly committed suicide due to non-fulfillment of dowry demands. The Court determined the victim's unnatural death within three years of marriage and postmortem evidence led to bail rejection. Main issues included the validity of evidence and the nature of the death. The Court stated: 'I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail'.

Result: 'the regular bail petition of the petitioner is hereby rejected'.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

4 17-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the Informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sakurabad P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025 dated 25.02.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 80 and

3(5) of B.N.S. , 2023.

3. As per allegation, dowry death of daughter of the informant has been committed on account of non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 5 lac and a motorcycle by the parents of the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact while the deceased was coming from her maike along with her husband/petitioner, her golden ornaments were stolen and hence, she was in depression and committed suicide.

5. He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 14.05.2025.

6. It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 7. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.

8. However, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant vehemently oppose the prayer of the petitioner for bail submitting that on account of inability of the poor parents of the deceased, they could not fulfill the illegal demand of dowry and hence, the daughter of the informant has been subjected to brutal dowry death. The postmortem report also supports that she has been killed by hanging and there were several external injuries on her person as per the postmortem report and this dowry death has been committed within three years of her marriage.

9. Considering the fact that the victim has died within three years of her marriage and said as unnatural death on account of hanging, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

10. Accordingly, the regular bail petition of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Jitendra Kumar, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top