SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3064

PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sitamarhi Cyber P.S. Case No. 27 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 , 420, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(D) of I.T. Act .

3. As per allegation, Rs.30,000/- has been drawn from the account of the informant by some unknown persons without his knowledge and consent.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR has been lodged against unknown. He also submits that the whole prosecution case against the petitioner is based on his confessional statement before the Police in which he has confessed that he was involved in the alleged offence whereas there is no corroborative evidence subsequent to the statement brought on record by the prosecution.

5. He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 12.09.2024.

6. It has also been stated in paragraph No. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has been made accused in two other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top