SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3065

PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Manish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ganesh Prasad Yadav
For the Respondents: Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Phulwari Sharif P.S. Case No.1199 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2) & 96 of the B.N.S. , 2023.

3. As per allegation, a thirteen year old daughter of the informant has been enticed away by the Petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further refers to the statement of the alleged victim as recorded under Section 183 B.N.S. S., wherein she has clearly stated before learned Judicial Magistrate, that she was acquainted with the accused/Petitioner because she was living in the vicinity of the Petitioner. As per her further statement, she was beaten by her parents on 24.07.2025. Hence, she went to Manish Kumar, without giving any information to her parents, and subsequently went to Dildarnagar in U.P. When her father along with the police reached there on 25.07.2025, she came back to her home. In her statement, she has also stated that she wants to live with her parents. H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top