SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3069

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Jitendra Kumar, J
Ajay Kumar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Tilak Sao
For the Respondents: Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No.417 of 2025, dated. 11.08.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8 /20(b)(ii)

(B) of the N.D.P.S., Act.

3. As per allegation, total 1.29 Kg ganza has been recovered from the possession of the Petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

5. He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 12.08.2025.

6. It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 7. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.

8. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.

9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly the small quantity of the contraband, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top