PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 254 of 2025 dated 21.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act .
3. As per allegation, the arms were recovered from co-
accused, Lala Yadav and Lalan Bind which were used in the commission of murder for which Ara Town P.S. Case No. 247 of 2025 was registered and as per the confessional statement of co- accused, Lala Yadav and Lalan Bind, the arms were procured from the present petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no recovery of any arms in pursuance of Ara Town P.S. Case No. 247 of 2025 from the petitioner and the arms were recovered from the co-accused, Lala Yadav and Lalan Bind. The only material against the petitioner is so-called confessional statement of co-accused, Lala Yadav and Lalan Bind to the police as per which the same arms were procured from him
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.