SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3080

PATNA HIGH COURT
JITENDRA KUMAR, J
Sant Kumar Prasad @ Sant Jaiswal @ Shant Kumar Prasad @ Shant jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.553 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Abhishek Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP

The court reviews balancing bail considerations with allegations, emphasizing procedural safeguards against false implications.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with cases registered under various provisions of law. Allegations indicate involvement with a group causing harm, yet the petitioner claims innocence, citing lack of evidence and prior enmity. The court, upon consideration, grants bail under specific conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 532 of 2025 dated 11.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. As per allegation, co-accused along with 100-200 unknown persons came over the land of the informant and started doing firing and yielding iron rod causing fracture on the head of Chandan Kumar who is son of the informant. Subsequently, when few persons came to rescue the victim they were also assaulted. It is further case of the prosecution that the informant came to know later on that amongst the accused persons, petitioner was one of unknown 100-200 persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that prosecution case against the petitioner is totally based on suspicion and previous enmity.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the nature of allegation, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 532 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023 , and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Jitendra Kumar, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top