SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3086

PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Sourav Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Kumar S.K.
For the Respondents: Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 193 of 2024, dated 16.08.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323, 354, 504, 506 and 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of D.P. Act .

3. As per allegation, the marriage between the informant and the petitioner were solemnized in the year, 2022 and subsequent to the marriage, there was demand of additional dowry and on account of non-fulfillment of the same, she has subjected to cruelty for various ways.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that during investigation, petitioner has got benefit of Section 41A Cr.PC and he has cooperated with the investigation. He further submits that charge-sheet has been submitted and now cognizance has been taken and summon has been issued against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is apprehending that he may be taken into custody by the Court below. He also

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top