SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3093

PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Ravi Ranjan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Bharat Bhushan

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seeks bail, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025, dated.12.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. , 2023.

3. As per allegation, the Petitioners along with other co-accused lased with lathi and danda started abusing and attacking the informant and her family members and as per the further case of the prosecution, the Petitioner, Ravi Ranjan caused injury on the head of the brother-in-law of the Informant, whereas the Petitioner Vivek Kumar injured Krishna Mahto by farsa.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He also submits that the alleged injury caused by the Petitioners is simple in nature. He further submits that the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Court below itself.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top