Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Khatim Reza, J
Fekni Devi and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar Rai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. circumstances of substitution petition after death. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. negligence argument by respondent. (Para 8) |
| 3. court's decision on substitution and costs. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER
10 09-01-2026 Learned counsel for the parties are present.
Re: I.A. No. 9188 of 2018
2. This interlocutory application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for substituting the names of the heirs of appellant nos. 6 & 9 who died on 10.07.2018 & 22.06.2018 respectively whose details are mentioned in paragraph no. 3. This interlocutory application has been filed on 07.12.2018. 3. It is further submitted that appellant no. 6, namely, Md. Hushna died leaving behind his two sons, namely, Sheikh Laddu & Sheikh Bablu. Appellant no. 9, namely, Meena Devi died leaving behind his two sons namely, Pankaj Kumar, Jugesh Tanti and one daughter, namely, Puja Devi.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants further submitted that a duly executed Vakalatnama on behalf of the heirs of deceased appellant nos. 6 & 9 have already been filed along with this interlocutory application.
Re: I.A. No. 3 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
