SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3186

PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Ravindra Choudhary & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram Jha & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/s: Mr. Pranay Ranjan
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Md.Imteyaz Ahmad

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

18 20-01-2026 Re: I.A. No. 3 of 2024 The present interlocutory application has been filed for substituting the names of the heirs and legal representatives of respondent no.1, namely late Sita Ram Jha, who died on 19.05.2014, leaving behind his heirs and legal representatives, whose details are mentioned in paragraph no.2 of the interlocutory application.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the wife of respondent no.1 had predeceased him. It is further submitted that the application for substitution has been filed on 20.01.2024, which is beyond the prescribed period of limitation.

Re: I.A. No. 5 of 2024

3. This interlocutory application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act for setting aside abatement against respondent no.1 and for condoning the delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that earlier Mr. Pranav Ranjan, Mr. Ashiwani Rai and Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma were appearing on behalf of the appellants as junior counsels to the learned senior counsel Mr. Keshav Shrivastava. Durin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top