SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3187

PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Kranti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ravindra Yadav – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/s:Mr. Dronacharya, Advocate, Mr. Rama Shankar Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s: Mr.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

9 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant(s).

2. These two Second Appeals arise out of Title Suit No. 04 of 2014, which was decreed partly. Against the judgment of Title Suit No. 04 of 2014, two appeals were filed; one by the plaintiff-appellant vide Title Appeal No. 07 of 2016 and another by the defendant-appellant vide Title Appeal No. 05 of 2016.

Both the appeals were heard separately and Title Appeal No. 07 of 2016 filed by the plaintiff-appellant was allowed while Title Appeal No. 05 of 2016 filed by the defendant-appellant was dismissed. Against both the judgments and decrees, these two second appeals have been filed separately against respective judgment and decree.

3. The defendant is the appellant in both the instant Second Appeals. The plaintiff-respondent filed suit bearing Title Suit No. 04 of 2014 for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the Schedule B land along with mesne profits from the date of dispossession till recovery of possession of the suit land.

4. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that the plaintiff had purchased the land described in Schedule A of the plaint through a register

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top