SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3190

PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Gopal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Baleshwar Kamat|For the Respondents: Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

4 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jhanjharpur R.S. P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025 dated 03.07.2025, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act .

3. The allegation is of recovery of one live cartridge and a mobile phone of Samsung Company from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that similarly situated co-accused person namely, Saddam Khan from whose possession one live cartridge and a mobile phone of Samsung Company was recovered has been granted bail vide order dated 24.12.2025 passed by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 74776 of 2025. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 03.07.2025, having one criminal case against him and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top