PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Sunil Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Imadpur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025 dated 31.08.2025, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)A/26 of the Arms Act .
3. The allegation is of recovery of one country made pistol and one live cartridge from the house of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. From perusal of the seizure list, it shows that a country made pistol and a live cartridge were recovered from the house of the petitioner. In the seizure list, all are official witness. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2025 having four criminal cases against him. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.