PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Vijay Jha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Punaura P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025 dated 27.10.2025, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 111 , 308(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8 , 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act .
3. The allegation is of recovery of 110 gms Charas like substance, a country made pistol and three live cartridges concealed beneath the tree on the disclosure made by the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the seizure list was prepared on
27.10.2025 at 01:04 am but the FIR was lodged on the same date at 02.20 am i.e. after preparation of seizure list but still the seizure report contains FIR number which means that the seizure memo is a tabled report prepared in the police station itself. There is no independent witness to the seizure list, which is against the provision of N.D.P.S. Act. It is next submitted that the seized Charas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.