SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3220

PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Vijay Jha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Punaura P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025 dated 27.10.2025, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 111 , 308(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8 , 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act .

3. The allegation is of recovery of 110 gms Charas like substance, a country made pistol and three live cartridges concealed beneath the tree on the disclosure made by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the seizure list was prepared on

27.10.2025 at 01:04 am but the FIR was lodged on the same date at 02.20 am i.e. after preparation of seizure list but still the seizure report contains FIR number which means that the seizure memo is a tabled report prepared in the police station itself. There is no independent witness to the seizure list, which is against the provision of N.D.P.S. Act. It is next submitted that the seized Charas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top