SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3223

PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Vishnu Kumar Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4660 of 2026|PS. Case No.-175 Year-2025



Advocates:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Bimal Kumar
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP

Bail granted based on lack of direct evidence and non-identification of seized property.

Headnote:The court analyzed the provisions under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 regarding bail applications. The petitioner argued he was not named in the FIR and the evidence against him relied solely on a co-accused's confessional statement. The bail was granted considering the circumstances and the lack of concrete evidence linking the petitioner to the crimes charged. The court highlighted the issues surrounding the evidence and potential wrongful linkage to the case, ultimately allowing the petitioner's bail application.

Table of Content
1. court's decision on granting bail. (Para 6)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Korha PS Case No.175 of 2025 dated 26.07.2025, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 331 (4), 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that when the informant returned to his residence in Fulbaria village after the absence of twenty three days, he found the gate was locked from inside, but the lock of courtyard of the house was broken and the house had been ransacked. The Godrej lockers were found to be opened and valuable items were missing. It is alleged that the unknown thief had stolen approximately 400 Grams of gold and

500 grans of silver ornaments as well as Rs.45,000/- in cash.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, he has been made accused in this case. Further submission is that on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused some recovery have been made from the jewellery shop of the petitioner which is being run by the petitioner. It is further submitted that the articles which have been seized have not been put on test identification parade by the informant or his parents. The petitioner has a jewellery shop and the seized articles are not the stolen articles, rather, those are common articles and usually found in every jewellery shops. It is again submitted that the prayer of the petitioner for bail has been rejected only on the ground that one case of similar nature is pending against the petitioner in which he has been granted bail. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 22.08.2025 having one criminal case against him.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in Korha PS Case No.175 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed.

(Khatim Reza, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top