SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3226

PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Vishal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Rakesh Singh
For the Respondents: Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 291 of 2025, dated 05-09-2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 8 ( c), 21(b), 22, 27(A) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.

3. The allegation is of recovery of 42 gram of heroine -like substance from the pocket of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that no contraband has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The seizure list has been prepared in violation of Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The seized illicit article is more than the small quantity but much below the commercial quantity. It is also submitted that the petitioner has only one criminal case pending against him under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, in which he is already on bail and he has been in judicial custody since 06.09.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top