Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Amlesh Kumar Verma
For the Respondents: Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, A/C to AAG-11

Court emphasizes the importance of verifying compliance with previous orders.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Second Appeal No.174 of 2000 in the High Court of Judicature at Patna. The court primarily considered compliance of an earlier order dated 04.12.2025 as submitted by counsel for the appellants. The Judge directed the office to verify the compliance as stated. The judgment concludes with the directive from the court.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

17 29-01-2026 Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that order dated 04.12.2025 has already been complied on

16.01.2026.

2. Office is directed to verify and act accordingly.

(Khatim Reza, J)

sankalp/-

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :