SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3235

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Khatim Reza, J
Ramesh Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Most. Urmial Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kamil Akhtar
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

18 30-01-2026 Re: I.A. No. 06 of 2026 This interlocutory application has been filed for deleting the name of respondent nos. 1 and 10, who died during pendency of this appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that respondent no. 1, namely, Urmila Devi died on 06.12.2025 leaving behind her heirs and legal representatives, who are already on record as respondent nos. 2 to 4. So far respondent no. 10, namely, Shanti Devi is concerned, she also died during pendency of this appeal. It is further submitted that respondent no. 10, who was defendant no. 5 in the suit did not chose to file written statement neither contested the suit nor contested the title appeal and prayed for deleting the name of respondent no.

10.

3. Considering the aforesaid facts and averments made in the interlocutory application, I.A. No. 06 of 2026 is allowed.

4. Office is directed to delete the name of respondent nos. 1 and 10 at their own risk from the memo of appeal.

(Khatim Reza, J)

prabhat/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top