PATNA HIGH COURT
Khatim Reza, J
Balasdeo Rai and Ors – Appellant
Versus
Hari Narain Rai and Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for substitution of deceased parties. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's observations on lack of opposition to the applications. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. concluding orders regarding substitution and correction of records. (Para 12) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER
22 10-02-2026 Re: I.A. No. 8 of 2022 The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the appellants under Order XXII Rule 4(i) of the Code of Civil Procedure for substituting the names of the heirs of respondent no. 1(b), namely, Chotan Rai, respondent no. 8, namely, Ram Nandan Rai as well as respondent no. 9, namely, Sita Ram Rai.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that earlier the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.07.2018, whereafter a restoration application being M.J.C. No. 2514 of 2018 was filed. During the pendency of the said M.J.C., respondent nos. 8 and 9 have died on 23.01.2021 and 30.01.2021 respectively and a petition for substitution of their heirs was filed in the said M.J.C., which were allowed vide order dated 29.09.2021 in I.A. No. 04 of 2021. Consequently, the present appeal was restored to its original f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.