SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3320

PATNA HIGH COURT
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
Dipu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6276 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Deepak Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, GP-16, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, AC to GP-16

The court confirmed that the release of a vehicle involved in criminal proceedings is contingent upon the outcome of said proceedings.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The case concerns the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Facts of the Case: The petitioner seeks to quash an order requiring a fine for vehicle release.

Findings of Court:
The vehicle has already been released to the petitioner under a previous order pending criminal proceedings.

Issues: The court determines the validity of the enforcement of the fine order considering the vehicle's release.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes that the vehicle's release is contingent on the outcome of the ongoing criminal proceedings, reiterating an earlier ruling.

Result: The order dated 02.07.2025 be made absolute, subject to criminal proceedings.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

5 21-01-2026 Though the present writ petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 28.08.2024, passed in Excise (Confiscation) Bhabua (Kaimur) Case No. 94 of 2024 by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bhabua (Kaimur), whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to deposit a fine of Rs. 5,00,000/- (rupees five lacs) + a sum of Rs.15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) in favour of B.S.B.C.L. in order to get the vehicle in question released in his favour, which arises out of Kaimur (Bhabua) Prohibition P.S. Case No. 759 of 2023 dated 10.11.2023, lodged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act , 2016, however, the learned counsel for the petitioner as also that of the respondent-State jointly submit that in pursuance to the earlier order of this Court dated 02.07.2025, the vehicle in question has been released in favour of the petitioner.

2. At this juncture, it would be apt to reproduce paragraph no. 2 of the said order dated 02.07.2025 hereinbelow:- “2. In the meanwhile, respondents are hereby directed to release the subject matter of the vehicle in favour of the petitioner after due verification of ownership, such release of the subject matter of the vehicle is subject to outcome of the criminal proceedings.”

3. The Ld. Counsels for the parties are in agreement that since the vehicle in question has already stood released in favour of the petitioner, the order dated 02.07.2025 be made absolute however, such release be made subject to the outcome of the connected criminal proceedings, as aforesaid. It is directed accordingly.

4. It is needless to state that the petitioner shall not alienate the aforesaid vehicle bearing Registration No. JH01CX4009, Engine No. 4018289, Chassis No. MCAAJPBY5JFA26698, in any manner till the final disposal of the criminal proceedings.

5. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top