SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3323

PATNA HIGH COURT
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
Guddu Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through Principle Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17685 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate, Ms. Priya, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Kumar, A.C. to G.P.4

The court recognized the right to a fair hearing before confiscation of personal property under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Headnote:The petition was filed for the release of a motorcycle and mobile seized in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The Court noted that a prior order to confiscate the items was issued without notifying the petitioner. The petitioner was granted liberty to appeal against the order. The Court clarified that the vehicle would not be auctioned until the appeal was resolved.

Result: The writ petition stands disposed of as per the terms outlined.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

3 22-01-2026 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for release of Pulsar motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR24AM7854 and Vivo V29 mobile which have been seized in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 dated 13.06.2024 registered under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 .

2. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the respondent-State has referred to the counter-affidavit filed in the present case to show that the learned Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Buxar Sadar has already passed the final order dated 18.02.2025 in Case No. 104/2024/277/2024 whereby and whereunder an order for confiscating the motorcycle of the petitioner and other vehicles has been passed and it has also been ordered that the said vehicles be put on auction sale.

3. In response, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no notice was given to the petitioner and behind his back the aforesaid order dated 18.02.2025 has been passed, hence the petitioner be granted liberty to challenge the same by filing appeal under Section 92 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 . Liberty, so sought, is granted.

4. It is needless to stated that in case appropriate appeal is filed within a period of four weeks from today before the appellate authority, the same shall be considered on merits and a reasoned and a speaking order shall be passed thereon in However, it is clarified that in case the petitioner files vehicle in question shall not be auctioned till the final disposal of the appeal.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top